From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2015 proposal: Improve the performance of “ALTER TABLE .. SET LOGGED / UNLOGGED” statement |
Date: | 2015-04-06 03:31:13 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+ru5Y5RyOVLxx_Cz62pc_9R=WO46w_KdduaZ13akkO91w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZM+-0R7h0eDPzZjbokVVQ+gAVKChmno4fypVEccW-EqA@mail.gmail.com
>
> I like the idea of the feature a lot, but the proposal to which you
> refer here mentions some problems, which I'm curious how you think you
> might solve. (I don't have any good ideas myself, beyond what I
> mentioned there.)
>
How the cleanup will happens?
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-04-06 03:53:41 | Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. ); |
Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2015-04-06 03:23:03 | Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. ); |