Re: Can pg_dump make use of CURRENT/SESSION_USER

From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can pg_dump make use of CURRENT/SESSION_USER
Date: 2015-03-18 17:42:39
Message-ID: CAFcNs+rsqSbW_ekvH3RvDE1jHmivTLQt=XxVu3W_=2g9b9_1HQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> > If we ever implement something like
> >> >
> >> > COMMENT ON CURRENT_DATABASE IS ...
> >> >
> >> > it will be useful, because you will be able to restore a dump into
> >> > another database and have the comment apply to the target database.
> >
> > I think it's simple to implement, but how about pg_dump... we need to
add
> > new option (like --use-current-database) or am I missing something ?
>
> I think we'd just change it to use the new syntax, full stop. I see
> no need for an option.
>

Ok.

> >> > (Also, I wonder about
> >> > ALTER USER foo IN DATABASE current_database ...
> >> > because that will let us dump per-database user options too.)
> >>
> >> +1 for both of those ideas.
> >
> > Can you explain more about this idea?
>
> Uh, what do you want explained?
>

There's no need, sorry. I just misunderstood it first.

I'll provide the patches.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-03-18 17:44:02 Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-03-18 17:28:13 Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit