From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error with index on unlogged table |
Date: | 2015-03-25 15:46:25 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+qVHVnLLzOXtuEKKxK1O6godWYiAJE0ejymgZ_gDGTb+g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-03-25 11:38:30 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> > > The index is unlogged until reindexing...
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > Which is think also raises the question, why are unlogged indexes made
> > > persistent by a reindex?
> >
> > That's a bug of HEAD, ~9.4 keeping the index as unlogged even after
> > REINDEX INDEX. What happens is that ReindexIndex relies on
> > relpersistence provided by makeRangeVar at parse time, which is just
> > incorrect as it uses RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT all the time. The patch
> > attached fixes that...
>
> What the hell? That's somewhat nasty. Nice that it got caught before 9.5
> was released.
>
Unfortunately this is very nasty. Sorry!
> Did you check whether a similar bug was made in other places of
> 85b506bb? Could you additionally add a regression test to this end?
> Seems like something worth testing.
>
I'm checking it and adding some regression tests.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-03-25 15:49:35 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-25 14:34:06 | Re: Ignoring entries generated by autoconf in code tree |