From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options |
Date: | 2013-12-31 11:32:59 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+pGA9owtGwu_mstU72LG4tsNgSO_AeD6j95RFXMyV8JUQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am looking on this patch
>
> ALTER TABLE foo SET (ext.somext.do_replicate=true);
>
> Why is there fixed prefix "ext" ?
>
> This feature is similar to attaching setting to function
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ... SET var = ...;
>
> We can use someprefix.someguc without problems there.
>
Hi,
We use the prefix "ext" (aka namespace) to distinguish these options which
are related to "extensions".
Have you seen the previous thread [1] ?
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-12-31 11:38:34 | Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-12-31 11:10:56 | Re: Proposal: variant of regclass |