Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options

From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options
Date: 2013-12-31 11:32:59
Message-ID: CAFcNs+pGA9owtGwu_mstU72LG4tsNgSO_AeD6j95RFXMyV8JUQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am looking on this patch
>
> ALTER TABLE foo SET (ext.somext.do_replicate=true);
>
> Why is there fixed prefix "ext" ?
>
> This feature is similar to attaching setting to function
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ... SET var = ...;
>
> We can use someprefix.someguc without problems there.
>

Hi,

We use the prefix "ext" (aka namespace) to distinguish these options which
are related to "extensions".

Have you seen the previous thread [1] ?

Regards,

[1]
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFcNs+rqCq1H5eXW-cvdti6T-xo2STEkhjREx=OdmAkK5tiOOw@mail.gmail.com

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-12-31 11:38:34 Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-12-31 11:10:56 Re: Proposal: variant of regclass