Re: psql should show disabled internal triggers

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:37 PM, fabriziomello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On 2013-09-18 15:15:55 +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote:
> > On 2013-09-18 15:15:55 +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote:
> > > --On 18. September 2013 13:52:29 +0200 Andres Freund
> > > &lt;andres@&gt; wrote:
> > >
> > > >If you do ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE TRIGGER ALL; and then individually
> > > >re-enable the disabled triggers it's easy to miss internal triggers.
> > > >A \d+ tablename will not show anything out of the ordinary for that
> > > >situation since we don't show internal triggers. But foreign key
checks
> > > >won't work.
> > > >So, how about displaying disabled internal triggers in psql?
> > >
> > > Hi had exactly the same concerns this morning while starting to look
at
> > the
> > > ENABLE/DISABLE constraint patch. However, i wouldn't display them as
> > > triggers, but maybe more generally as "disabled constraints" or such.
> >
> > Well, that will lead the user in the wrong direction, won't it? They
> > haven't disabled the constraint but the trigger. Especially as we
> > already have NOT VALID and might grow DISABLED for constraint
> > themselves...
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch [1] enable PSQL to list internal disabled triggers in
\d
> only in versions >= 9.0.
>
> [1] psql-display-all-triggers-v1.patch
> <
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n5775954/psql-display-all-triggers-v1.patch
>
>

Hi all,

I'm just send a new WIP patch rebased from master.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello