Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability

From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability
Date: 2024-02-12 21:20:44
Message-ID: CAFcNs+oajeEDcW3-ypHT=NNRnpLWuL3_3qS-69voAqOu3+bH8Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 5:51 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:09:06PM +0100, Mats Kindahl wrote:
> > Here are the two fixed patches.
>
> These patches look pretty good to me. Barring additional feedback, I'll
> plan on committing them in the next few days.
>

Also did some tests locally and everything went well. Patches apply to the
main branch without issues and all regression (including checkworld) pass!!

Regards
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Luzanov 2024-02-12 21:29:32 Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column
Previous Message Alena Rybakina 2024-02-12 21:19:21 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions