Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16

From: MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Date: 2023-05-20 21:32:36
Message-ID: CAFbpF8NyOiw=aJ5RsRTeUJNKf=erqCEvYPENeSDMDN8YsuJm5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 4:04 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> With "yet to see any significant changes" do you mean that the runs are
> comparable with earlier runs, showing the same regression? Or that the
> regression vanished? Or ...?
>

I mean that I might be chasing noise and the mean+stddev for throughput in
version 16 pre-beta so far appears to be similar to 15.2. When I ran the
insert benchmark a few times, I focused on the cases where 16 pre-beta was
worse than 15.2 while ignoring the cases where it was better. Big
regressions are easy to document, small ones not so much.

Regardless, I am repeating tests from both the insert benchmark and
sysbench for version 16 (pre-beta, and soon beta1).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-05-20 22:01:33 Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2023-05-20 18:33:19 Re: Adding SHOW CREATE TABLE