Re: OOM Killer / PG9 / RHEL 6.1

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OOM Killer / PG9 / RHEL 6.1
Date: 2011-11-02 17:59:00
Message-ID: CAFaPBrQGCN9tOHo14c+BZY76a8i3R0_Z45+hDGDcZOxkg8-BxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:42, David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> just a quick check, is
> vm.overcommit_memory = 2
> vm.swappiness = 0
>
> Still the way to go with PG9.0 / RHEL 6.1 (64bit) ?

IMHO yes (although I never touch swappiness...)

> I know we gained some control over the OOM Killer in newer kernels
> and remember reading that maybe postgres could handle it in a different way now.

If you compile with -DOOM_ADJ (which I think the red hat rpms do?)
yes. As usual the docs are fairly good:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/kernel-resources.html#LINUX-MEMORY-OVERCOMMIT

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-02 18:21:00 Re: postgresql-9.1.1 PQescapeByteaConn() generating incorrectly quoted output.
Previous Message Adam Cornett 2011-11-02 17:55:40 Re: 9.1 replication on different arch