| From: | Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Batch TIDs lookup in ambulkdelete |
| Date: | 2025-06-09 22:24:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAFY6G8dT83G5yvEJW=HrAZPaNQK5o=nJ-9neQFtrbsmSa5+Qcw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/06/25 18:34, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> Thank you for the report. With the 0001 and 0002 patches, I got a
> SEGV. I've fixed this issue in the attached updated version patches.
> I've confirmed that the patches pass CI tests but I'm not sure it
> fixes the shared memory segment leak problem you reported. The
> attached patches incorporated the comments[1] from John as well.
>
Thanks for the new version. I've tested the v3 version attached on [1]
and I can confirm that the tests are now passing and I can't see the
shared memory issues that I've mentioned on v1.
Thanks!
--
Matheus Alcantara
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Koval | 2025-06-09 22:48:33 | Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands |
| Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-06-09 22:22:00 | Re: Periodic FSM vacuum doesn't happen in one-pass strategy vacuum. |