Re: [patch] pg_dump/pg_restore zerror() and strerror() mishap

From: Vladimir Kunschikov <kunschikov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [patch] pg_dump/pg_restore zerror() and strerror() mishap
Date: 2017-07-28 18:11:03
Message-ID: CAFWCTZa2o0xM9XFbKOPaWd=urONkCEmFimH9Dao474_q7P2ELg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>This "maxlen" business and the fallback error message are
>strange. We have roughly equivalent code in pg_basebackup.c
>which has been working since 2011
>Perhaps you can drop the memchr/fallback tricks and adopt the
>pg_basebackup coding? Or is there a specific reason to have
>the memchr check?

Ofcourse that tricks can be dropped, function will be much prettier.
'Tricks' were made to pass some strict internal tests.
Initially I used exactly that function from pg_basebackup.c:
https://github.com/kunschikov/postgres/commit/15e9fda6df51cf17c0b0a4f201ee0f93cf258de9#diff-98e3f8ce5d6e87950dd66e4c8bdedb21R713
It was rewritten for the sake of somewhat exaggerated security.
Version #5 in attachment.

--
Regards,
Vladimir Kunschikov

Attachment Content-Type Size
strerror-gzerror-zlib-v5.patch text/x-patch 2.7 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-07-28 18:19:13 Re: [patch] pg_dump/pg_restore zerror() and strerror() mishap
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-07-28 17:47:09 Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call