Re: [patch] pg_dump/pg_restore zerror() and strerror() mishap

From: Vladimir Kunschikov <kunschikov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [patch] pg_dump/pg_restore zerror() and strerror() mishap
Date: 2017-07-28 18:41:23
Message-ID: CAFWCTZZYck4iz+JU6BuNnuv78qW5qJdQtEQxN8TPqWFMY9yJLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I haven't seen that but can't guarantee that such case does not exist

28 июля 2017 г. 9:19 PM пользователь "Alvaro Herrera" <
alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> написал:

> Vladimir Kunschikov wrote:
> > >This "maxlen" business and the fallback error message are
> > >strange. We have roughly equivalent code in pg_basebackup.c
> > >which has been working since 2011
> > >Perhaps you can drop the memchr/fallback tricks and adopt the
> > >pg_basebackup coding? Or is there a specific reason to have
> > >the memchr check?
> >
> > Ofcourse that tricks can be dropped, function will be much prettier.
> > 'Tricks' were made to pass some strict internal tests.
>
> Well, if there are cases which cause zlib to return a message that
> causes a crash when printing it or some other problem, then let's use
> your version both in this new code and in pg_basebackup. Do these cases
> really exist?
>
> > Initially I used exactly that function from pg_basebackup.c:
> > https://github.com/kunschikov/postgres/commit/
> 15e9fda6df51cf17c0b0a4f201ee0f93cf258de9#diff-
> 98e3f8ce5d6e87950dd66e4c8bdedb21R713
> > It was rewritten for the sake of somewhat exaggerated security.
> > Version #5 in attachment.
>
> I'd rather have all the security we can get, so before dropping those
> protections, let's make sure they are useless.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-07-28 18:42:06 Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-07-28 18:35:21 Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows