| From: | Artem Gavrilov <artem(dot)gavrilov(at)percona(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inaccurate statement about log shipping replication mode |
| Date: | 2025-09-01 11:51:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAFPkQKyGw+dnWZQM6QsqXWY_czqvvwMvF9Qfb4x916ZzHiRHeA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 1:20 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Yep, the original statement is rather inexact. Now, your new wording
> does not make me really comfortable with the case of cascading stanbys
> in scope, because the asynchronous property applies to them all the
> time.
This is another unclear part. As I understand in configuration `Master
-> Upstream -> Downstream` replication between Master And Upstream
still can be synchronous, while between Upstream and Downstream is't
always async. Am I wrong here?
--
Artem Gavrilov
Senior Software Engineer, Percona
artem(dot)gavrilov(at)percona(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-09-02 07:28:30 | Re: Inaccurate statement about log shipping replication mode |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-08-31 23:20:04 | Re: Inaccurate statement about log shipping replication mode |