Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-07-09 02:48:17
Message-ID: CAFPTHDa-LedPs7vNwMyWw_dediE50vPXiN2NDqv32ei=1KKk3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:31 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for showing the interest in patch. How have you ensured that
> streaming is happening? I don't think the proposed patch can ensure
> it for every case because we also rely on logical_decoding_work_mem to
> decide whether to stream/spill, see ReorderBufferCheckMemoryLimit. I
> think with your patch it will allow streaming for cases where we have
> large amount of WAL to decode.
>
>
Maybe I missed something but I looked at ReorderBufferCheckMemoryLimit,
even there it checks the same function ReorderBufferCanStream () and
decides whether to stream or spill. Did I miss something?

while (rb->size >= logical_decoding_work_mem * 1024L)
{
/*
* Pick the largest transaction (or subtransaction) and evict it from
* memory by streaming, if supported. Otherwise, spill to disk.
*/
if (ReorderBufferCanStream(rb) &&
(txn = ReorderBufferLargestTopTXN(rb)) != NULL)
{
/* we know there has to be one, because the size is not zero */
Assert(txn && !txn->toptxn);
Assert(txn->total_size > 0);
Assert(rb->size >= txn->total_size);

ReorderBufferStreamTXN(rb, txn);
}
else
{

I will also add debug and test as you suggested.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-07-09 03:11:03 Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-07-09 02:40:42 Re: Is this a bug in pg_current_logfile() on Windows?