| From: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Filter irrelevant change before reassemble transactions during logical decoding |
| Date: | 2025-06-03 06:25:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAFPTHDYX-2Mx=MA67Ujx1CQ9L-Lg04Mtgv+n0AJ1r_zUhxROOA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:55 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> You haven't shared the exact test scenario, but I am assuming the
> above tests are for very large transactions, as you are comparing
> streaming and non-streaming modes. Can we see results with short
> transaction size (say one insert or one update, or one delete) as
> well?
>
Attaching the scripts I used for my tests. Yes, I used transactions
with large inserts. I will redo the tests with short single inserts
and share the results here.
regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Filter Performance test.zip | application/zip | 2.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shinya Kato | 2025-06-03 06:35:20 | Add log_autovacuum_{vacuum|analyze}_min_duration |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-06-03 05:54:56 | Re: Proposal: Filter irrelevant change before reassemble transactions during logical decoding |