| From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yaamini Bist <yaamini(dot)bist(at)ericsson(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nitin Mehndiratta <nitin(dot)mehndiratta(at)ericsson(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostGre compatible to RHEL 6.1 |
| Date: | 2011-09-29 12:26:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAFNqd5Wu7DdQ1S1oA+BTTthYcfi=kkrXt2H_wYVOQ2U7ud7yGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Yaamini Bist <yaamini(dot)bist(at)ericsson(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be really great if you can provide me information Is PostGre compatible to RHEL 6.1 ?
This is a mailing list for addressing bugs that are found with PostgreSQL.
There isn't any such system as "PostGre", and whether that is
compatible with a particular Linux-based system is not a bug in
PostgreSQL.
If you were interested in what support there is for PostgreSQL in
RHEL, you might want to check with the vendor. They document this
reasonably well, even within their marketing literature. See:
<http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/>
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-29 15:39:28 | Re: BUG #6231: weird to_timestamp behaviour with out of range values |
| Previous Message | Yaamini Bist | 2011-09-29 11:23:08 | PostGre compatible to RHEL 6.1 |