Re: [PATCH] pl: fix can not build free-thread for plpython extension like 3.14t

From: 洪伊 <zouzou0208(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pl: fix can not build free-thread for plpython extension like 3.14t
Date: 2026-01-16 04:33:18
Message-ID: CAFDmy2yfx9VO7ToV-+axhwVry5vuCj9Q1E2DZ0=HTsOXTdVGZw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

I understand the reason for using Py_LIMITED_API, and python 3.14t is a
standard build from cpython team.

link:
https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.14.html#whatsnew314-free-threaded-now-supported

It seems the only way to build plpython for free-thread python is to use
Py_LIMITED_API, otherwise it fails to build.

Thanks
Hong Yi

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> =?UTF-8?B?5rSq5LyK?= <zouzou0208(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > This patch fix can not build plpython for free-thread python like
> > python3.14t
>
> We've gone to fairly considerable trouble to switch to using Python's
> limited API, for reasons described here:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ee410de1-1e0b-4770-b125-eeefd4726a24@eisentraut.org
>
> I don't see why we should abandon that for the convenience of
> somebody's evidently-nonstandard Python build.
>
> The proposed patch also breaks the header isolation that
> the separate plpython_system.h header is meant to maintain.
> Arguably we should have #define'd Py_LIMITED_API inside
> plpython_system.h, not where it is. But I don't feel a need
> to mess with that without a far better argument for why
> we should change this at all.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2026-01-16 04:35:30 Re: Simplify code building the LR conflict messages
Previous Message jian he 2026-01-16 04:22:43 Re: using index to speedup add not null constraints to a table