From: | Bert <biertie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: On columnar storage (2) |
Date: | 2016-03-03 08:46:09 |
Message-ID: | CAFCtE1mpTWzip=Z3nUhtNh2JiBtop9Pb6Ki9ujXipnq_aLFcbw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Haribabu,
Thank you for the performance test. But please not that the patch is
'thrown away', and will be totally rewritten. I have no idea of the status
of the second / third attempt however.
However, what is interesting is that for some queries this patch is already
on par with VCI. Which db is that exactly?
Alvaro,
You wrote that a wiki page would be opened regarding this. But I still
cannot find such a page (expect for an old page which hasn't changed in the
last year). Is there already something we can look at?
Bert
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > So we discussed some of this stuff during the developer meeting in
> > Brussels and the main conclusion is that we're going to split this up in
> > multiple independently useful pieces, and write up the general roadmap
> > in the wiki so that we can discuss in detail on-list.
> >
> > I'm marking this as Returned with Feedback now.
> >
> > Thanks everybody,
>
> Here I attached the DBT-3 performance report that is measured on the
> prototype patch
> that is written for columnar storage as I mentioned in my earlier mail
> with WOS and ROS
> design.
>
> Currently to measure the benefits of this design, we did the following
> changes,
> 1. Created the columnar storage index similar like other index methods
> 2. Used custom plan to generate the plan that can use the columnar storage
> 3. Optimized parallelism to use the columnar storage
>
> The code is not fully ready yet, I posted the performance results to
> get a view from
> community, whether this approach is really beneficial?
>
> I will provide the full details of the design and WIP patches later.
>
> Regards,
> Hari Babu
> Fujitsu Australia
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>
--
Bert Desmet
0477/305361
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-03-03 09:05:06 | proposal: psql autocomplete for casting |
Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2016-03-03 08:20:43 | Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex |