Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS

From: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
Date: 2025-09-05 08:19:04
Message-ID: CAFCRh-9n5RsGoJWXFqmqmOKxfA0WWQCVBt9gSMnyPz3G5DzCvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 1:10 AM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Dumb question: did you read the release notes?

Well, now I have. Carefully. Nothing stands out.
There's RLS mentioned, but for indexing only.
So no smoking gun. We'll have to investigate... :(

> In our case, 17.6 "pg_dump --schema-only" broke in the sense that the md5sum of yesterday's schema dump is different from today's schema dump. Puzzled, I ran "pg_dump --schema-only" twice in a row, but the md5sum was different.
> "diff" showed why. Searching the release notes showed me what changed.

Thanks for the heads up.
We don't depend on pg_dump at all.
We have our own COPY BINARY based custom backup/restore
to semi-structured SQLite DBs (part relational, part per-row COPY blobs).

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2025-09-05 12:19:00 Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2025-09-04 23:21:07 Re: Debugging query performance in postgres