From: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpq: COPY FROM STDIN BINARY of arrays |
Date: | 2023-03-31 12:34:22 |
Message-ID: | CAFCRh-8QhKRT3RTmQ+PzgwwHF6k_8iVNY4veE4eVJTarG0tHBA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 6:00 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Does the wire-format of arrays differ between binary-binds and
> binary-copy?
>
> No.
>
An update on this, I think I figure it out, by comparing with COPY TO
STDOUT WITH (FORMAT BINARY).
I was missing the byte-count "header" for the array. Since I'm reusing my
binary-bind code for COPY,
I'm missing the 4 bytes for the array's "total encoded byte length" before
the array data proper.
Now that I understand the issue, should be a simple matter to fix. Thanks
for chiming in Tom. --DD
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2023-03-31 13:46:39 | Cannot terminate backend |
Previous Message | Siddharth Jain | 2023-03-31 00:05:30 | Question on creating keys on partitioned tables |