Re: LOCALE C.UTF-8 on EDB Windows v17 server

On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 5:01 PM Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> wrote:
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > > locale 'C.UTF-8' or lc_collate 'C.UTF-8' lc_ctype 'C.UTF-8'
> > > cannot work on Windows because Windows does not have a locale
> > > named C.UTF-8, whereas a Linux system does (well at least recent
> > > Linuxes. Some old Linuxes don't).
> >
> > But isn't the point of the new-in-v17 builtin provider is to be system
> > independent???
>
> Yes, definitely.
>
> But suppose your database has an extension that calls local-dependent
> code, such as strxfrm() [1] for instance.
>
> The linked MSVC doc says:
>
> "The transformation is made using the locale's LC_COLLATE category
> setting. For more information on LC_COLLATE, see setlocale. strxfrm
> uses the current locale for its locale-dependent behavior"
>
> But what will be the value in LC_COLLATE when this extension code
> is running in a database using the builtin provider?
> It's the value found in pg_database.datcollate that was specified
> when creating the database with the lc_collate or locale option.
>
> The builtin provider routines are used for code inside Postgres
> core, but code outside its perimeter can still call libc functions
> that depend on lc_collate and lc_ctype.

So you're saying datcollate and datctype from pg_database are
irrelevant to PostgreSQL itself, and only extensions might be affects?

Which implies that I shouldn't worry about those differences?
Am I reading you right? --DD