| From: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Raphael Salguero Aragón <raphael(dot)salguero(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, Asad Ali <asadalinagri(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Customize psql prompt to show current_role |
| Date: | 2024-11-27 14:45:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAFCRh--eBdLugZWSdyfwSihSPiKbqvBfnJOgO6YBYvxTA8AeBw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:14 PM Raphael Salguero Aragón
<raphael(dot)salguero(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Am 23.09.2024 um 17:37 schrieb Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > I'd be glad to use Pavel's proposed %N. —DD
> I just wanted to add that we are also supporting a larger customer with exactly the same request.
> Perhaps this increases the value of the adjustment a little more :)
Hi. Thanks for sharing Raphael. That's a 3rd notch Tom! :)
So is it the proverbial "third time's a charm" and the community would
revise its initial rejection?
I keep making that point, but the fact this is entirely opt-in,
mitigates the "expensive" argument IMHO.
FWIW. Thank you for considering this RFC again, especially since
there's a patch for it. Respectfully, --DD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-11-27 18:52:36 | Re: PostgreSQL 15.10 update corrective action for ATTACH PARTITION/DETACH PARTITION |
| Previous Message | Raphael Salguero Aragón | 2024-11-27 14:14:04 | Re: Customize psql prompt to show current_role |