From: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
Date: | 2025-09-04 15:28:41 |
Message-ID: | CAFCRh--CwoXZMq9WcaG7bAQQcQ6F-NZP2Z=PUgwnjKUtTBaz3A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 5:18 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 17:03 +0200, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > OK with 16.9 and 17.5 (we cannot test on beta2 anymore)
> > KO with 16.10 and 17.6 (and beta3 too, released at the same time)
> >
> > Which for a minor patch is a surprise to us, not in a good way.
> >
> > So... Did anything change around RLS in this patch series?
> > Anything changed around ROLE INHERIT rules?
> >
> > The symptom is that a LOGIN user lacks ROLEs is used to have.
> > So perhaps some GRANTs are now silently doing nothing,
> > for some unknown reasons.
> >
> > What in these patches could be affecting those areas?
>
> Without a reproducer, that is a wild goose chase.
Oh, it's easy to reproduce here...
But distilling it down is no small feat.
But this is a patch. Patches are not supposed to break things.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dominique Devienne | 2025-09-04 15:31:03 | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-09-04 15:18:31 | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |