Re: small cleanup: unify scanstr() functions

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: small cleanup: unify scanstr() functions
Date: 2020-10-05 09:37:27
Message-ID: CAFBsxsHv+vLDCzmMk9dY14nBb0X-2MenBDrZw1fYyw4AthA-Rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 4:20 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I didn't try very hard to trace the commit history, but I did note that
> > almost all of the removed #includes dated to 1996 or so. I'm surprised
> > they survived Bruce's occasional attempts at removing unused #includes;
> > maybe his script didn't check .y/.l files.
>
> That is some ancient detritus! Thanks for committing.
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-10-05 09:46:02 Re: Support for OUT parameters in procedures
Previous Message k.jamison@fujitsu.com 2020-10-05 09:34:13 RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist