Re: Minimum bison and flex versions

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minimum bison and flex versions
Date: 2022-09-06 06:32:32
Message-ID: CAFBsxsH7ef3tLqUQs6h-_Z7g6vV7ycnMWs8kDeDiWBiAKnnymQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 4:04 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2022-09-02 16:29:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > > On 2022-09-02 15:08:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'd be content for now to set the minimums at 2.3 and 2.5.35.
>
> +1

Here are autoconf-only patches to that effect.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0002-Bump-minimum-version-of-Flex-to-2.5.35.patch text/x-patch 6.4 KB
v2-0001-Bump-minimum-version-of-Bison-to-2.3.patch text/x-patch 11.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ibrar Ahmed 2022-09-06 06:37:32 Re: Summary Sort workers Stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Previous Message Ibrar Ahmed 2022-09-06 06:32:18 Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?