Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, wengyanqing(at)ymatrix(dot)cn, wanghao(at)ymatrix(dot)cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Date: 2023-07-05 07:11:02
Message-ID: CAFBsxsGxPCi0xN2YFia_WiyMnSZfr9SDNFkJ2RKFfrj-uCokDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 9:16 AM YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn> wrote:
>
> Is there any other comment?

It's only been a few weeks since the last patch, and this is not an urgent
bugfix, so there is no reason to ping the thread. Feature freeze will
likely be in April of next year.

Also, please don't top-post (which means: quoting an entire message, with
new text at the top) -- it clutters our archives.

Before I look at this again: Are there any objections to another CRC
implementation for the reason of having no buildfarm member?

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-05 07:18:44 Re: evtcache: EventTriggerCache vs Event Trigger Cache
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-07-05 07:03:33 Re: On /*----- comments