Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, wengyanqing(at)ymatrix(dot)cn, wanghao(at)ymatrix(dot)cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Date: 2023-08-10 05:04:48
Message-ID: CAFBsxsGkQ3cyfVxjs0MGEd-V4EDiTS1DA4XzS0_ZFiocyDMrQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 2:22 PM YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn> wrote:
>
> On 2023/8/8 14:38, John Naylor wrote:
>
> > v4 0001 is the same as v3, but with a draft commit message. I will
> > squash and commit this week, unless there is additional feedback.
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks for the additional patch.

I pushed this with another small comment change. Unfortunately, I didn't
glance at the buildfarm beforehand -- it seems many members are failing an
isolation check added by commit fa2e87494, including both loongarch64
members. I'll check back periodically.

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiro Ikeda 2023-08-10 05:09:57 Re: Fix pg_stat_reset_single_table_counters function
Previous Message Pavel Luzanov 2023-08-10 04:56:12 Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready