Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
Date: 2022-11-04 00:55:20
Message-ID: CAFBsxsGGGX7KD6RxbNoSJzuSc8Gz3hOxcfhTOMLB_hJcm68dKQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 5:42 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> The CI is able to complete without it. Would you mind if it is
> removed? If you don't want us to poke more at the bear, that's a nit
> so leaving things as they are is also fine by me.

I've removed it.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2022-11-04 00:58:23 Re: On login trigger: take three
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2022-11-04 00:52:39 Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths