Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2022-07-19 04:10:33
Message-ID: CAFBsxsGFUpMFM950JJx=YeSxM6oCk27R5NM2v-VhQmVK_mSWjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 9:24 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> FWIW, I think the best path forward would be to do something similar to
the
> simplehash.h approach, so it can be customized to the specific user.

I figured that would come up at some point. It may be worth doing in the
future, but I think it's way too much to ask for the first use case.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-19 04:13:34 Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-07-19 04:07:59 Re: Rename some rel truncation related constants at the top of vacuumlazy.c