Re: i.e. and e.g.

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: i.e. and e.g.
Date: 2022-07-21 05:30:04
Message-ID: CAFBsxsEZdnYuc984iGaSqt-_Ywq_AM1Mk5BNpQXVeetaRmjkLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:22 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> At Thu, 21 Jul 2022 10:20:30 +0700, John Naylor <
john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote in
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 3:40 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <
horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> > > By the way, I forgot about back-branches. Don't we need to fix the
> > > same in back-branches?
> >
> > The intent of the messages is pretty clear to me, so I don't really see
a
> > need to change back branches. It does make sense for v15, though, and I
> > just forgot to consider that.
>
> Ok, I'm fine with that. Thanks!

This is done.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-07-21 05:54:49 Re: Remove useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord().
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-21 05:04:18 Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump