| From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Replacing pg_depend PIN entries with a fixed range check |
| Date: | 2021-07-14 20:10:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAFBsxsE7j=w-JSVB+D1XWDbTFiiRQFart9oYqW4AZ1SdP_izRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:34 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hm, I'm not following? setup_depend runs in initdb, that is on the
> client side. It can't invoke backend-internal functions any other
> way than via SQL, AFAICS.
Ah, brainfade on my part.
I was also curious about the test case where Andres fixed a regression in
the parent thread [1], and there is a noticeable improvement (lowest of 10
measurements):
HEAD: 623ms
patch: 567ms
If no one else has anything, I think this is ready for commit.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210406043521.lopeo7bbigad3n6t%40alap3.anarazel.de
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-07-14 20:28:13 | Re: Quick tip on building pg with Visual Studio Build Tools 2019 + small patches |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-07-14 19:43:47 | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |