| From: | saurabh gupta <saurabh(dot)b85(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Postgresql Replication Comparison Required |
| Date: | 2011-12-29 11:25:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAFBMSeqH30fVatuUM0nepYcMEfCasLZXefHNFwP+JUoZ5dzfFA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I am doing POC on Posgtresql replication. I am using latest version of
postgresql i.e. 9.1. There are multiple replication solutions avaliable in
the market (PGCluster, Pgpool-II, Slony-I). Postgresql also provide
in-built replication solutions (Streaming replication, Warm Standby and hot
standby). I am confused which solution is best for the financial
application for which I am doing POC. The application will write around 160
million records with row size of 2.5 KB in database. My questions is for
following scenarios which replication solution will be suitable:
If I would require replication for backup purpose only
If I would require to scale the reads
If I would require High Avaliability and Consistency
Also It will be very helpful if you can share the perfomance or experience
with postgresql replication solutions.
Thanks
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eduardo Morras | 2011-12-29 12:58:02 | Re: Refine Form of My querry |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2011-12-29 10:25:31 | Re: Unable to Increase the column which was part of Primary key |