Re: CUDA Sorting

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CUDA Sorting
Date: 2011-09-19 19:48:14
Message-ID: CAF6yO=1Td0tF4F0H+vT0_FbJnqowpaK6wPRYbpVOpE=ohKi2bg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/9/19 Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 09/19/2011 10:53 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>> But couldn't that also be seen as a chicken/egg situation?
>
>
> The chicken/egg problem here is a bit deeper than just "no one offers GPUs
> because no one wants them" on server systems.  One of the reasons there
> aren't more GPUs in typical database server configurations is that you're
> already filling up some number of the full size slots, and correspondingly
> the bandwidth available to cards, with disk controllers.  It doesn't help
> that many server class motherboards don't even have a x16 PCI-e slot on
> them, which is what most GPUs as delivered on regular consumer video cards
> are optimized for.
>

Sandy bridge and ivy bridge intel series are CPU/GPU. I don't know how
using the GPU affect the CPU part but it might be interesting to
explore...

--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Tolley 2011-09-19 19:56:31 Re: Grouping Sets
Previous Message PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2011-09-19 19:41:34 Re: CUDA Sorting