From: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Arseny Sher <sher-ars(at)ispras(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arseny Sher <sher-ars(at)yandex(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-students(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion |
Date: | 2017-03-22 18:58:44 |
Message-ID: | CAF4Au4zezAsfbX4FRohnTNgQh_c_Px-O3aC=03keTt7AwCkvxw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-students |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Arseny Sher <sher-ars(at)ispras(dot)ru> wrote:
> > While I admire your fearlessness, I think the chances of you being
> > able to bring a project of this type to a successful conclusion are
> > remote. Here is what I said about this topic previously:
> >
> > http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoa=kzHJ+TwxyQ+vKu21nk3prkRjSdbhjubN7qvc8UKuG
> g(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
>
> Well, as I said, I don't pretend that I will support full functionality:
> >> instead, we should decide which part of this work (if any) is
> >> going to be done in the course of GSoC. Probably, all TPC-H queries
> >> with and without index support is a good initial target, but this
> >> needs to be discussed.
>
> I think that successfull completion of this project should be a clear
> and justified answer to the question "Is this idea is good enough to
> work on merging it into the master?", not the production-ready patches
> themselves. Nevertheless, of course project success criterion must be
> reasonably formalized -- e.g. implement nodes X with features Y, etc.
>
How many GSoC slots and possible students we have ?
Should we reject this interesting project, which based on several years of
research work of academician group in the institute ? May be better help
him to reformulate the scope of project and let him work ? I don't know
exactly if the results of GSoC project should be committed , but as a
research project it's certainly would be useful for the community.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-03-22 19:09:57 | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2017-03-22 18:49:28 | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sher-ars | 2017-03-23 06:43:02 | Re: [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion |
Previous Message | Arseny Sher | 2017-03-22 17:04:08 | Re: [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion |