Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding

From: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Date: 2016-03-08 15:25:08
Message-ID: CAF4Au4zc2sVR7wEZwWk9ku3BnHM4DaXMUHxX1WTQ=aoVBjrVVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Either that, or bless experimental features/API as an official concept.
> I'd quite like that myself - stuff that's in Pg, but documented as "might
> change or go away in the next release, experimental feature". As we're
> doing more stuff that spans multiple release cycles, where patches in a
> prior cycle might need revision based on what we learn in a later one, we
> might need more freedom to change things that're committed and user visible.
>
>
+1

> --
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-03-08 15:28:18 Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-08 15:24:41 Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.