From: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Top features in 9.6? |
Date: | 2016-04-11 22:21:24 |
Message-ID: | CAF4Au4yz5rdLsr6O4g8Ha9qq+YD9oNq6Y4h6s_BNmJheW0zeNQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> So, let's make a list.
>
> Mine:
>
> * parallel query (seqscan & aggregation)
> * bloom filter supporting indexes
>
Create AM+Generic WAL - these are C-API, but we can work on various AM as
extensions, expect some to 9.6.
> The generic progress reporting framework is tempting, but seems hard to
> explain as a marquee feature. What else have we got?
>
> --
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Red Hat OSAS
> (any opinions are my own)
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-04-11 22:25:55 | Re: Top features in 9.6? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-04-11 22:09:32 | Re: Top features in 9.6? |