From: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding |
Date: | 2016-03-03 03:32:26 |
Message-ID: | CAF4Au4yfeLuV3XC6a5ofrd=xkvL1LaTaBAygA=9x0NJ3W=ZgAQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 3, 2016 4:47 AM, "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > If FDWs existed then Postgres XC/XL were being developed then I believe
they
> > would try to build full-featured prototype of FDW based sharding. If
this
> > prototype succeed then we could make a full roadmap.
>
> Speaking here with my XC hat, that's actually the case. A couple of
> years back when I worked on it, there were discussions about reusing
> FDW routines for the purpose of XC, which would have been roughly
> reusing postgres_fdw + the possibility to send XID, snapshot and
> transaction timestamp to the remote nodes after getting that from the
> GTM (global transaction manager ensuring global data visibility and
> consistency), and have the logic for query pushdown in the FDW itself
> when planning query on what would have been roughly foreign tables
> (not entering in the details here, those would have not been entirely
> foreign tables). At this point the global picture was not completely
> set, XC being based on 9.1~9.2 and the FDW base routines were not as
> extended as they are now. As history has told, this global picture has
> never showed up, though it would should XC have been merged with 9.3.
> The point is that XC would have moved as using the FDW approach, as a
> set of plugins.
>
> This was a reason behind this email of 2013 on -hackers actually:
>
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTDjf-58wuf-xZ01NKJ7WF0E+EUKgGQHd0igVsOD4hCJQ@mail.gmail.com
Good to remember!
> Michael
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2016-03-03 03:45:41 | Re: psql completion for ids in multibyte string |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-03-03 03:06:56 | Dockerfile for testing with Perl 5.8.8 |