Re: Index corruption revealed after upgrade to 11.17, could date back to at least 11.12

From: Allan Kamau <kamauallan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index corruption revealed after upgrade to 11.17, could date back to at least 11.12
Date: 2022-10-27 09:29:58
Message-ID: CAF3N6oR7Q2f=e68U_vs5MW9u5ru37tcYVjEs+FnK-5Ze8rpgoQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 12:18 PM Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> wrote:

> On 2022-10-27 10:55:31 +0300, Kristjan Mustkivi wrote:
> > We use dockerized postgres.
>
> So that means you aren't just replacing PostgreSQL, but your complete OS
> (except the kernel). What is the source of your docker images? Do they
> all use the same base OS distribution? Are the locale definitions the
> same?
>
> (Just trying to rule other other possible error sources.)
>
>
> > I do apologize, but I do not understand the value of doing that select
> > juggling.
>
> I think Allan may have misread your mail.
>
> hp
>
> --
> _ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
> |_|_) | |
> | | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
> __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
>

Hi Peter,

It was a long shot. I was trying to suggest determining if indeed the data
does actually contain duplicating values in the mentioned columns.
Then test to see if the index construction on the new table can be
successful on both versions and see if the error is reproducible.

-Allan.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2022-10-27 10:32:21 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2022-10-27 09:18:00 Re: Index corruption revealed after upgrade to 11.17, could date back to at least 11.12