Re: Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE

From: Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
Date: 2017-10-09 23:57:26
Message-ID: CAF3+xMLP0uL3Mp=8f3rWz9G_qTAXRgjZu6AR3TJu2J84OUAN_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

I don't know why the previous email can't be linked with the original email
webpage. It is weird. So supplementing following information for
understanding:

The original email link:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAF3%2BxM%2BxSswcWQZMP1cjj12gPz8DXHcM9_fT1y-0fVzxi9pmOw%40mail.gmail.com

The recent email with updated patch is as following:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAF3%2BxMKkKpd8oVRpN9i1BFMau2dFhVrt-Y0BE%3DDsoKtOm%3DC2AQ%40mail.gmail.com

--
Regards,
Jing Wang
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-10 00:19:11 heap/SLRU verification, relfrozenxid cut-off, and freeze-the-dead bug (Was: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool))
Previous Message David Rowley 2017-10-09 21:45:42 Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping