| From: | solai v <solai(dot)cdac(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dinesh Salve <cooltodinesh(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Yilin Zhang <jiezhilove(at)126(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: explain plans for foreign servers |
| Date: | 2026-08-06 07:34:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAF0whudOpa7dkL-J6aAwHJi4SvHpt2B4PU9spUZMWP_zo6Ys8Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Dinesh,
I tested the v7-0001-postgres_fdw-show-remote-EXPLAIN-plans-via-REMOTE.patch .
I verified the updated changes, including the new handling for a
non-existent remote table, and everything worked as expected. I also
confirmed that the existing REMOTE_PLANS functionality continues to
work correctly, and the postgres_fdw regression test passed
successfully.
I didn't notice any regressions during my testing.
Regards,
solai
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-08-06 07:39:41 | Re: [Patch]The Case For WAL-Logging pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2026-08-06 07:29:38 | Re: Fix Grammar in Buffer Lock Wait Message |