From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Inanc Seylan <inanc(dot)seylan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: UDF in C slow |
Date: | 2012-05-11 14:21:35 |
Message-ID: | CAF-3MvNt+9yd0VvDnXTV5Y3gNERgZUPtd0HCFk=xRvCijLfFVA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11 May 2012 15:57, Inanc Seylan <inanc(dot)seylan(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have implemented a user-defined function in C that returns a boolean value
> after some computation. Now I have a query Q such that when I specify the
> function in the WHERE clause of Q, Q runs in 40 secs and if I don't use the
> function it runs in 4 secs. Then I thought that my implementation of this
> function could be slow; so I decided to write a very simple function that
> just returns true without any computation. To my surprise, it also takes
> around 40 seconds to run Q with the new very simple function. Does anybody
> have a clue about what might be going wrong?
Is that a VOLATILE, STABLE or IMMUTABLE function? What's the output of
EXPLAIN ANALYZE?
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Inanc Seylan | 2012-05-11 14:39:50 | Re: UDF in C slow |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-05-11 14:17:49 | Re: avoiding CONTEXT messages |