Re: unexpected psql "feature"

From: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unexpected psql "feature"
Date: 2016-07-14 10:38:51
Message-ID: CAEzk6fdgFP+_U-CHgjCxzV56uGKk4kojXbJQmjp0CgHyquerqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 July 2016 at 00:12, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I wonder
> whether promoting \; to a recognized and documented behavior would
> allow us to get away with converting -c strings to normal parsing
> behavior, as was discussed and then rejected on compatibility grounds
> not too long ago. People who need to keep the old behavior could do so
> by putting in backslashes.
>

Just so I'm clear: you're suggesting that
because people can modify their code to achieve the old behaviour it's no
longer breaking compatibility?

​That's an odd definition, IMO.

Geoff

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-07-14 11:03:47 Re: Hash Indexes
Previous Message Kenan Yao 2016-07-14 09:53:40 Hang issue when COPY to/from an unopened FIFO