Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit

From: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, KAWAMICHI Ryoji <kawamichi(at)tkl(dot)iis(dot)u-tokyo(dot)ac(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Everaldo Canuto <everaldo(dot)canuto(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit
Date: 2018-01-24 14:02:36
Message-ID: CAEzk6fcm3VkZ9Do9Tc7x6cFj2QKThB0x_fmM_uTjBY_0ngF1Kw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 January 2018 at 13:58, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> But there's a simple solution to that: make it two messages, one when
> inside quotes ("Use Control-C to clear the input buffer, then \q to
> quit") and one outside (current wording). Wasn't this already proposed
> elsewhere in the thread?

I don't mean to harp on, but I haven't seen a reason why writing "Use
Ctrl-D on an empty line to quit" (with just "Use Ctrl-C to quit" on
Windows) is any worse than this. Certainly writing "Control-C to clear
the input buffer" on Windows is utlimately confusing, given that it
will actually quit immediately.

Geoff

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2018-01-24 14:31:39 Re: Failed to request an autovacuum work-item in silence
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-01-24 13:58:14 Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit