Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date: 2024-01-18 09:49:48
Message-ID: CAEze2WjhdVCqEe_qqEok3NA6DwUdOGSBjAxzmYdAqiaaH1uRcg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 21:10, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:42 PM Matthias van de Meent
> <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Sure, added in attached.
>
> I think this mostly looks good now but I just realized that I think
> this needs rephrasing:
>
> + To restore incremental backups the tool <xref
> linkend="app-pgcombinebackup"/>
> + is used, which combines incremental backups with a base backup and
> + <glossterm linkend="glossary-wal">WAL</glossterm> to restore a
> + <glossterm linkend="glossary-db-cluster">database cluster</glossterm> to
> + a consistent state.
>
> The way this is worded, at least to me, it makes it sound like
> pg_combinebackup is going to do the WAL recovery for you, which it
> isn't. Maybe:
>
> To restore incremental backups the tool <xref
> linkend="app-pgcombinebackup"/> is used, which combines incremental
> backups with a base backup. Afterwards, recovery can use <glossterm
> linkend="glossary-wal">WAL</glossterm> to bring the <glossterm
> linkend="glossary-db-cluster">database cluster</glossterm> to a
> consistent state.

Sure, that's fine with me.

Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-01-18 09:54:10 Re: subscription disable_on_error not working after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION set bad conninfo
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-01-18 09:48:54 Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization