Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Date: 2022-05-11 12:19:20
Message-ID: CAEze2WjctmFzZ=dAvGZ6wOtWLH7ZKYnO4AQ0pVpg4Z-5XNNH9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 17:44, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I have completed the first draft of the PG 15 release notes and you can
> see the results here:
>
> https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-15.html
>
> The feature count is similar to recent major releases:
>
> release-10 195
> release-11 185
> release-12 198
> release-13 183
> release-14 229
> --> release-15 186
>
> I assume there will be major adjustments in the next few weeks based on
> feedback.

With 10a8d138 (an extension on the work of PG14's 3c3b8a4b, which was
listed in the release notes for PG14) we now truncate the LP array in
more cases, which means that overall a workload with mainly HOT
updates might require VACUUM to run less often to keep the relation
size stable.

I will admit that I am tooting my own horn, but I think it is worth
mentioning for DBAs, as it reduces the bloating behaviour of certain
classes of bloat-generating workloads (and thus they might need to
re-tune any vacuum-related settings).

-Matthias

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-05-11 12:51:48 Should use MERGE use BulkInsertState ?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-05-11 11:33:54 Re: Logical replication timeout problem