Re: [PATCH] set_byte() with a count argument

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] set_byte() with a count argument
Date: 2026-09-21 12:44:49
Message-ID: CAEze2Wi8Xz3BLW1uwL3UvU08tTAO8Y3y8xvkj6TN3hM63OX4Wg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 21 Sept 2026 at 14:23, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> 0002 adds a four-argument set_byte():
>
> set_byte(bytes bytea, n integer, newvalue integer, count integer)
>
> setting count consecutive bytes from byte n to newvalue:
>
> SELECT set_byte('\x0000000000'::bytea, 1, 255, 3);
> => \x00ffffff00
>
> Today this needs nested set_byte() calls, each copying the whole
> value. The new form does one copy and one memset().

Doesn't the `overlay(bytea, ...)` function already provide the feature
you're looking for (possibly combined with repeat() for ease of use)?
See https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-binarystring.html#id-1.5.8.11.5.2.2.6.1.1.1
and/or the ISO SQL spec for its specification.

Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent
Databricks (https://www.databricks.com)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ilia Evdokimov 2026-09-21 13:03:44 Re: Optimize MCV stats for sortable types and utilize sorted-order properties
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2026-09-21 12:41:54 Re: Write skew observed under serializable isolation