| From: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: BufmgrCommit no-op since 2008, remaining uses? |
| Date: | 2023-03-29 12:49:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAEze2Wh5SG6E3habbL77CddPw8zpWm_mGWa7neETVsrvROEhDg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 14:12, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > BufmgrCommit does exactly nothing; it is an empty function and has
> > been since commit 33960006 in late 2008 when it stopped calling
> > smgrcommit().
> > All two usages of the function (in our code base) seem to be in
> > xact.c. Are we maintaining it for potential future use, or can the
> > function be removed?
>
> Seems reasonable. Even if bufmgr grew a new need to be called
> during commit, it would quite possibly need to be called from
> a different spot; so I doubt that the function is useful even
> as a placeholder.
Then, the attached trivial patch removes the function and all
references I could find.
Kind regards,
Matthias van de Meent
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Cleanup-Drop-BufmgrCommit.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2023-03-29 12:49:40 | Re: SQL/JSON revisited |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2023-03-29 12:41:25 | Re: Tab completion for AT TIME ZONE |