| From: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 19 release notes and authors |
| Date: | 2026-04-04 15:06:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAEze2WgLEa_vHO9jJY+HRahToV9W2CfWwQUVoCObUQ46Y4_7Mg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 4 Apr 2026 at 16:50, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> In the PG 19 commits, I am seeing several commits with Author and
> Co-authored-by tags. FYI, I think we agreed that only the Author names
> are mentioned as the authors in the release notes.
If it's not the "Co-authored-by" tag, how else would a project of a
non-committer cooperating with a committer be tagged?
Publicly, the guidance for commit tag usage seems to be [0]
> "Co-authored-by:" is used by committers when they want to give
> full credit to the named individuals, but also indicate that they
> made significant changes.
Removing that committer's "full credit to the named individuals" seems
out of place to me.
Kind regards,
Matthias van de Meent
Databricks (https://www.databricks.com)
[0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Commit_Message_Guidance
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ChenhuiMo | 2026-04-04 15:29:06 | [PATCH] Optimize numeric comparisons and aggregations via packed-datum extraction |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2026-04-04 14:53:12 | Re: vectorized CRC on ARM64 |