Re: (SQL/PGQ) cache lookup failed for label

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (SQL/PGQ) cache lookup failed for label
Date: 2026-06-18 05:48:16
Message-ID: CAExHW5uHN-YiyHda4Gna4r1qKg_bBHe4mdmiuDxKXaZtoZHExw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 9:07 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 4:36 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > On 01.06.26 13:37, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > > As I mentioned earlier, I am creating patches for all outstanding
> > > issues from the same branch. So the patches attached here do not start
> > > from 0001, but they apply with git am on the latest master for me
> > > without any problem.
> > > 0005 - fixes `cache lookup failed for label`
> > > 0006 - fixes empty label expression and view behaviour
> > > 0007 - issue with labels shared by vertex and edges
> >
> > I have committed 0005, which I think was the topic of this thread.
> >
>
> Thanks a lot.

Moving this to resolved items since the original bug, which led to PG
19 open item is fixed.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-06-18 05:55:58 Re: Fix tuple deformation with virtual generated NOT NULL columns
Previous Message shveta malik 2026-06-18 05:44:34 Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication