Re: SQL/PGQ: quantified path patterns unsupported in GRAPH_TABLE (19beta2/beta3) — known gap or on the roadmap?

On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 11:38 PM chris <chris(at)chrisleephd(dot)us> wrote:

>
> A few questions, if anyone can point me in the right direction:
>
> 1. Is quantified path pattern support intentionally deferred past 19, or is there a patch/commitfest entry already in flight that I should be watching?

It's deferred. There is no concrete proposal (which covers all aspects
of quantified path) with patch yet.

> 2. If it's deferred, is there a tracking thread or open item I could link to, so the book can point readers at the right place instead of just saying "not yet"?

none ATM

> 3. Is there a recommended workaround inside SQL/PGQ itself for unbounded-depth traversal, or is a recursive CTE still the correct answer for that case in 19?
>

recursive CTE

> Thanks for all the work getting SQL/PGQ this far — the fixed-depth pattern matching and undirected edge support are genuinely nice additions.
>

Thanks for the compliments.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat