Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, navbarry(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)
Date: 2024-01-11 10:24:22
Message-ID: CAExHW5tmW5eMeE7Kqc489Ls3bwH=uHdi0x+vTVr+_6xyUL05tQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:38 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 13:41 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > It still reads a bit weird to me. How about the attached wording instead?
>
> Thanks! I am fine with your wording.

Works for me too.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2024-01-11 13:44:16 Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2024-01-10 19:51:10 Re: initdb username doc bug

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-01-11 10:52:56 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-01-11 10:22:37 Re: Make attstattarget nullable